What does the popular vote count towards Daikasa / 06.07.202006.07.2020 The Electoral College and Popular Vote Explained ?·?Additionally, under the Electoral College system, electoral outcomes can undermine the popular vote. Because 48 states and Washington, D.C. award their votes on a winner-take-all basis,* it is technically possible for a candidate to win the presidency with around 23 percent of the national popular vote. While that’s unlikely to ever happen. ?·?This will be my first time voting and i just wanted to know more on the election process. I believe ive read that delegates determine who will be a presidential candidate for their party. With that in mind does that mean that popular vote in general and primary elections does not count? Im a registered voter does that make me a delegate. I would really appreciate any answers. In a presidential election, the popular vote simply means an aggregate of all voters from all states in America. The candidate who gets the most votes nationwide is said to have won the popular vote. But the winner of the popular vote may end up losing the election, like Al Gore did in and Hillary Clinton in In the presidential election, Hillary Clinton won This discrepancy occurs because although Americans vote directly for their chosen candidate in the presidential election every 4 years, the president is elected by the institution called the Electoral College. This article explains the difference between the electoral vote and the popular vote, i. There are total electors in the Electoral College, who are chosen by each state of the United States and by the District of Columbia but not by other territories like Puerto Rico. The number of electors for a state is based upon the voting membership of that state in Congress i. There are a total of Representatives and Senators in Congress; so along with 3 electors from the District how to attract cottontail rabbits Columbia that brings the total number of electors to In all states except Nebraska and Maine, electors are awarded on a winner-take-all basis. So in a closely contested election like Bush v. Maine and Nebraska use a slightly different method for allocating electoral votes. In the "Congressional District Method", one elector within each congressional district is selected by popular vote in that district. The remaining two electors representing the 2 U. Senate seats are selected by the statewide popular vote. This method has been used in Nebraska since and in Maine since A faithless elector is a member of the Electoral College who does not vote for how to convert excel file into pdf presidential or vice-presidential candidate for whom they had pledged to vote. Electors are typically chosen and nominated by the political party or the party's presidential nominee, so chances of them turning faithless is low. Nevertheless, there were 7 faithless electors in Donald Trump ended up getting electoral votes even though he wonand Clinton ended up with even though she won Some states have laws that requires electors to be faithful. However, not all of these states have penalties for faithless electors. Only Montana, Nevada, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana and Washington have passed the Uniform Faithful Presidential Electors Act, which requires votes from faithless electors to be disregarded and replaced with a new elector. If no presidential candidate gets electoral votes, the decision moves to the House of Representativeswhich would hold what's called a contingent election in which each state gets a single vote. Each state's delegation votes in favor of the party that has more House seats in that state. If this were to happen inthe Republican party would get a majority and elect Trump. Critics of the system that uses the electoral vote to choose a president argue that the system is unfair. They say that the system is undemocratic because the number of electoral votes is not directly proportional to the population of the state. This gives smaller states a disproportionate influence in presidential elections. For example, Hawaii has a population of only 1. If the power of a single vote were calculated in terms of number of number of people per electoral vote, states like New Yorkpeople per electoral vote and Californiapeople per electoral vote would lose. The winners would be states like Wyomingpeople per electoral vote and North Dakotapeople per electoral vote. In a popular vote, states with higher turnout will directly increase their influence in the outcome of the presidential race. Yet another criticism is that it discourages voters in states where one party holds a substantial majority i. Republicans in typically blue states like California or Democrats in red states like Texas. Since electoral votes are awarded on a winner-take-all basis, even a significant minority of contrarian votes will not make any impact on the outcome of the election. On the other hand, if a popular vote were to be used then every single vote has an impact. Supporters of using the electoral vote argue that it protects the rights of how to buy shares nz states and is a cornerstone of American federalism. States can design their own mechanism -- without federal involvement -- for choosing their electors. Another advantage is that the impact of any state-level problems, such as fraud, is localized. No political party can commit large-scale fraud in any one state to dramatically influence an election. It should be noted that the Electoral College merely follows from state influence in Congress, which enacts laws and acts as an inherent checks-and-balances mechanism for the president's administration. That is to say representation for various states in Congress is also not directly proportional to their population. The biggest criticism of the electoral vote system is that it is possible for a presidential candidate to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote. That is, more Americans voted for the candidate but he or she still lost. While this is rare, it has happened 4 times:. A Gallup poll in January found that a vast majority of Americans would prefer to do away with the electoral college for presidential elections. It would be wrong to assume that Hillary Clinton or Al Gore would have been president had the electoral college been abolished and elections were to be decided by popular vote. Indeed, Donald Trump has said he supports a popular vote election for president, and has reiterated this view even after winning the electoral college vote and losing the popular vote. As Aaron Blake argued when he wrote for the Washington Postthe electoral college forces candidates to structure their campaign in a specific way; they focus on about a dozen "purple" or swing states — such as Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Virginia, Iowa and New Hampshire. Republicans waste no resources campaigning in decidedly blue states like Washington, Oregon and California, while Democrats avoid campaigning in red states like Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma. If elections were decided by popular vote, campaign strategies would be very different. If Trump had campaigned more effectively in California, for example, his popular vote deficit in that state would possibly not have been as large as it was. Clinton got 4. In other words, if the state of California were excluded, Trump would win the popular vote by 1. Supporters of the electoral college system say that this was exactly the kind of scenario—i. As things stand now, the practical effect of the electoral college is that Republicans have an advantage over Democrats. Running an analysis of the electoral systemcomplete with simulations for various voting outcomes, the Economist magazine found that. The bias results from current political trends; when the system was designed over years ago the situation was quite different. Every state gets only two senators, no matter how populous. The populous states happen to have large urban populations that tend to be more Democratic-leaning. So in the political atmosphere that we find ourselves in how to unlock your car without a key, Democrats are at a disadvantage. Another years from now, the situation may well be reversed. Share this comparison:. If you read this far, you should follow us:. Diffen LLC, n. Electoral Vote vs. Popular Vote. Delegates convene and vote. Winner of that vote is elected for the position in question. Citizens vote for their choice of official for the position being elected. Votes are counted. Majority of votes is elected to that position. Bureaucracy Requires formation of some form of committee, college, or council to vote after they've been elected. May also have government oversight organizations. Requires no formation of such groups, nor the election of such groups. Establishment of Voting Districts Mandatory, regional delegates run for given district's delegate locations via their party or individually. Not required. Gerrymandering Present and created as a result of voting districts. Not created due to lack of need for voting districts. Party Benefits Favors majority parties, as they can concentrate resources, change bureaucracy, establish and gerrymander voting districts. Favors no party size in particular, though greatly improves potential for minority parties e. Modern History Does not allow higher populated areas say, CA or NY to take advantage of being able to always vote for the candidate, thereby underrepresenting the other rural areas of the nation. Thus, it safeguards smaller state interests. Harder to accomplish beyond geographically-close groups prior to modern transportation and communication. These hindrances are no longer in place for developed nations. How to cash on delivery Electoral College There are total electors in the Electoral College, who are chosen by each state of the United States and by the District of Columbia but not by other territories like Puerto Rico. Faithless Electors A faithless elector is a member of the Electoral College who does not vote for the presidential or vice-presidential candidate for whom they had pledged to vote. Advantages of the Electoral Vote over a Popular Vote Supporters of using the electoral vote argue that it protects the rights of smaller states and is a how much does the statue of liberty weigh in tons of American federalism. Different Winners of Electoral and Popular Vote The biggest criticism of the electoral vote system is that it is possible for a presidential candidate to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote. While this is rare, it has happened 4 times: George Bush electoral vote winner vs. Al Gore in Al Gore won the popular vote byvotes Benjamin Harrison electoral vote winner vs. Grover Cleveland in Rutherford B. Hayes winner vs. Samuel J. Tilden in Tiden won the popular vote byvotes John Quincy Adams won the electoral vote in but lost the popular vote to Andrew Jackson by 44, votes in Popular Support for the Electoral College A Gallup poll in January found that a vast majority of Americans would prefer to do away with the electoral college for presidential elections. Follow Share Cite Authors. Comments: Electoral Vote vs Popular Vote. Related Comparisons. Where does the 2020 electoral count stand? Share Tweet Email Copy and paste the text below, or send it in a new email message : Ever wonder what the difference between the Electoral College and the popular vote is? Here's an explanation! Every four years American citizens 18 years and older are eligible to cast their vote for the president of the United States. Seems simple - but many voters don't realize they aren't directly voting for the president. Because we use a system called the Electoral College to elect the president and vice president. Well first thing's first: the Electoral College isn't a place. The Electoral College was created by delegates in as a compromise between electing the president by a vote in Congress, or electing through a popular vote by qualified citizens. The Electoral College is a system where citizens indirectly elect the president and vice president through a body of electors. Electors are people chosen by their state parties prior to the general election who cast their vote for president on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December. Electors almost always cast their vote for the candidate who wins the popular vote in their state, which explains why we have election results available on Election Day. However, the Constitution does not require them to do so. There have been a few instances where electors defected from their pledged vote, but it has not changed the outcome of an election. The number of electors for each state is equal to the number of U. To win the presidency, a candidate must receive a minimum of electoral votes. For example: Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes. Regardless of how much one candidate wins the popular margin, all 20 electoral votes will go to that one candidate. In Nebraska and Maine, Electoral College votes are assigned in part by the presidential results in each of their congressional districts. For example: Nebraska has 5 electoral votes. If no candidate receives Electoral College votes, the president is then selected by the House of Representatives. Each state gets a single vote. Join the anti-corruption movement Join us Thank you for joining The Movement! Now, the most important thing you can do is invite others to join, too. When we receive the results from any presidential election, we are give two different results: the Electoral College and the popular vote. The popular vote is simply which candidate has received the most total votes. The short answer is: no, not right now. However, many states are taking measures towards electing the president by a popular vote. The National Popular Vote is a nonprofit working to implement a national popular vote for president, by creating an agreement among the states to elect by national popular vote. The compact will go into effect when enacted by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes An updated list of all the states that have passed a state-wide bill to enact the national popular vote can be found here. When in effect, states that are in the compact will guarantee their electoral votes go to the winner of the national popular vote, guaranteeing the president of the United States will be elected by popular vote. Battleground states are those that are a toss-up to either candidate. Often with many electoral votes at stake, these are where candidates spend most of their time and resources competing for votes. These states have a lot of power and can decide the outcome of a presidential election. Critics of the Electoral College claim it gives outsized power to small states because they are guaranteed three electoral votes despite lower population size. The makeup of the United States has changed a lot since the implementation of the Electoral College. Because of the distribution of electoral votes, some believe the Electoral College actually gives an advantage to some states. Meanwhile, people in states that have a large population but are not battleground states lose the value of their own vote because electoral votes are already decided and there is less incentive for candidates to spend time campaigning in that state. This perception of a loss of the value of their vote can decrease voter turnout. Discussions around the Electoral College and a popular vote have promising arguments on each side. For now, the Electoral College is here to stay but the power of the states is on the rise. Ultimately, the concept of electors choosing the president was a compromise that all states could agree to, with the state legislatures deciding how those electors would be chosen because the state legislatures were the closest body to the people. Join the anti-corruption movement. Thank you for joining The Movement! Share Tweet. Other Stories Here's how much telecom money it takes to turn a member of Congress against Net Neutrality. Join the movement.